By Martin Kidston/Missoula Current
A District Court judge on Tuesday found the City Council exercised reasonable discretion when it granted a partial demolition permit for the Missoula Mercantile, and it dismissed all other matters in the case as being moot.
The decision clears the way for Mercantile LLC to seek a deconstruction permit from the city and begin efforts to redevelop the downtown property with a new Marriott hotel.
In his ruling, District Judge Dusty Deschamps acknowledged the Mercantile’s rich history and the role it has played in regional commerce. Still, he said, the issue was a legal one, and not a political or philosophical one.
“The court has a personal sense of sadness and loss about the destruction of the building that is such an important piece of western Montana and Missoula history,” Deschamps wrote. “But the issue before the court is not an emotion or political one. It’s not even a factual dispute. It is a purely legal issue.”
A group of preservationists led by Preserve Historic Missoula had attempted to block the building’s deconstruction and redevelopment by Mercantile LLC, which plans to build a $35 million hotel on the downtown corner.
In filing its lawsuit, the group challenged the procedures use by the City Council when it overturned an earlier decision by the Historic Preservation Commission, which had initially denied the developer a demolition permit for the property.
Preserve Historic Missoula had attempted to argue that the City Council had reached its decision in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner. Deschamps disagreed in his ruling, saying the city followed its own rules and regulations, and exercised appropriate discretion.
“Everyone watching the process knew we were very serious and took in all facts,” said Ward 3 council member Emily Bentley. “I tried so hard to lead a process that was transparent and fair. This ruling definitely reflects that, in the sense that the judge was looking at process, and he agreed that we were judicious.”
Andy Holloran with HomeBase said the court struck the right tone in describing the Mercantile’s history and sentimental value felt by many city residents. He said the development team was not looking at the court’s decision as a victory but rather, as a step forward.
The decision puts to rest nearly 11 months of public hearings, testimony and legal wrangling.
“The City Council spent a great deal of time and effort and public hearings to analyze our appeal,” said Holloran. “There’s no question the judge did the same.”
While Holloran agreed with the judge’s personal reflections on the structure’s history, he maintained his position that the building had outlived its useful life. In its place, Holloran said, the development team looks to restore the corner’s vibrancy and commerce.
Under the development agreement with the city, the developers must preserve the pharmacy portion of the expansive Mercantile structure. The developers have said they plan to integrate many of the building’s historic components into their redevelopment project.
“It’s important to acknowledge that development and preservation can coexist, and it should in a downtown like Missoula that has so much history,” Holloran said. “Our hope is to work in conjunction and collaboratively with folks that care about preservation and see what we think is a fantastic project for downtown.”
In a statement released shortly after the court’s ruling, Preserve Historic Missoula said it was “profoundly disappointed” by the outcome. The group is asking the city to review its preservation ordinance, suggesting the process is flawed.
“This entire process sets a new standard, good or bad, for the future of historic preservation in our city as a commitment to acknowledge our heritage or, sadly, replace it,” the organization said. “We say again – historic preservation and successful downtown development are not mutually exclusive.”
With the court’s ruling now made, Holloran said his team would move forward with its project and seek the input of the city’s preservation community as the project advances.
“We are going to obtain our partial demolition permit from the city,” Holloran said. “We need to make the site safe, which will include fencing and shoring of the existing building. We look forward to beginning the deconstruction and salvage process. Our goal would be to begin as soon as possible.”
Preserve Historic Missoula also attempted to argue that the City Council’s decision to grant the demolition permit violated the Missoula Downtown Master Plan. In doing so, the group suggested that the council erred by not giving enough consideration to the plan’s mention of historic preservation.
While the 2009 master plan does mention historic preservation as a goal, it also seeks to strengthen and expand downtown Missoula’s role as an economic and cultural hub.
“The City Council was tasked with proportionately balancing these objectives, and by not singling out two objectives to the exclusion of others, (it) appears to have done so,” Descamps ruled.
“Moreover, once more in the absence of proof of arbitrary and capricious action, the Court is prohibited from entering its own assessment over that of the legislative body empowered to make the balancing decisions.”
Missoula Mayor John Engen also responded to the court’s decision.
“I’m glad that the court has affirmed the diligent, thoughtful work of the Missoula City Council,” he said. “As I’ve said from the beginning of this project, in a perfect world the entire building could be preserved, but time and experience suggest otherwise. HomeBase is bringing a great project to Missoula that will honor the history of that important downtown corner by restoring its vitality with a fine hotel, retail and restaurant space.”
Contact reporter Martin Kidston at email@example.com